Improving recognition of intellectual disability in healthcare and service records is “critical” to the care of people with intellectual disabilities, according to Adrian Raymond Walker and Professor Julian N. Trollor at the University of New South Wales.
However, according to their research, only one in five people with disability who are admitted to hospital have their disability recorded by hospital staff. Their article below was first published in The Conversation.
Adrian Raymond Walker and Julian N. Trollor write:
People with intellectual disability only have their disability noted by hospital staff in one in every five hospital admissions, our new study shows.
Recognising someone has a disability is critical to their care. This finding helps explain why many people with intellectual disability do not get hospital care that best meets their needs.
Urgent action is needed to make our hospital system safe, effective and tailored to the needs of around 450,000 Australians living with intellectual disability.
A system of neglect
Our research looked at historical information from hospitals and disability services in New South Wales between 2005 to 2015 (the most recent accessible data).
We found 12,593 adults with intellectual disability who used disability services in this time. In total, these adults went to hospital 80,960 times from 2005 to 2015. But in only 19,261 of these visits did the hospital recognise the person had an intellectual disability.
Intellectual disability is broadly defined as a lifelong condition that affects intellectual skills, behaviour and the ability to perform everyday tasks.
Intellectual disability exists across a spectrum. People with mild intellectual disability might engage in activities like full time work and sport. People with profound intellectual disability may not be able to communicate and require full time care.
Little has changed in the health care system to fix this issue since the data in our research was collected.
In 2008, Australia ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which protects the right to the highest attainable standard of health without discrimination on the basis of disability. But the reality for Australians living with intellectual disability is starkly different.
Right now, the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability is looking into problems faced by people with disabilities.
Based mainly on evidence from people with intellectual disability on the autism spectrum, the commission found people with cognitive disabilities face neglect in the health system. They found people with disabilities experience higher costs, longer waiting lists, physically inaccessible services and complex medical forms.
A person with intellectual disability may experience delayed diagnosis and inefficiency because of communication difficulties. Health professionals may lack the skills to assess and manage medical conditions when intellectual disability is also present.
Poorer care ends lives sooner
Our previous research has shown gaps in preventative health care, mental health care and in life expectancy. People with intellectual disability die on average 26 years younger than the general population.
Most of this difference in life expectancy is not specifically related to the intellectual disability itself or its causes. Rather, it relates to lifelong health disadvantage, lack of access and failure to manage emerging health conditions.
Potentially avoidable deaths (from conditions that could have been prevented through individualised care or treatment, like viral pneumonia, asthma, or diabetes) are more than twice as likely in people with intellectual disability.
Though Australia has one of the best health care systems in the world, people with intellectual disability experience neglect within it.
Ahead of the upcoming national election, people with intellectual disability are calling out this “deadly discrimination”.
How do we improve recognition?
To improve the recognition of intellectual disability when someone goes to hospital, we would like to see a national health disability indicator in the form of a code.
When noted on their health records, this indicator would tell the health care system a patient has an intellectual disability (with the permission of that person), and they might need reasonable adjustments to be made.
This indicator would help make intellectual disability visible in hospitals, and ensure people get the best possible care.
An indicator of this kind is already used in the UK. People with disabilities help set up their own indicators to make sure their needs are met.
Reasonable adjustments are things that need to be done to make health care accessible to a person with disability.
For people with intellectual disability, reasonable adjustments can include adjusting communication, providing extra time and support, and involving the person in choices and decisions. Research shows reasonable adjustments improve care.
In the UK, all hospitals must make reasonable adjustments and the person with disability must be asked about what adjustments they need. Hospitals that do not make reasonable adjustments risk losing accreditation and funding.
In New South Wales, hospitals are meant to make reasonable adjustments for people with disability. However, our study suggests most of the time, when a person with intellectual disability goes to hospital, this does not happen because the hospital remains unaware of their needs.
Adrian Raymond Walker is a Research Officer in Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales. Disclosure statement: He currently works in the Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry at The University of New South Wales, Sydney. The department receives core funding from the NSW Government Department of Health, and receives grants from multiple sources including the National Health and Medical Research Council.
Julian N. Trollor is a Professor in Medicine and Health, University of News South Wales. Disclosure statement: He receives core funding for his university department from the NSW Government Department of Health. He is also the recipient of multiple grants from national competitive grant bodies including but not limited to the National Health and Medical Research Council. He sits on multiple Commonwealth and State government committees related to the health and wellbeing of people with disabilities.
See Croakey’s archive of stories on disabilities and health.