Federal Budget October 2022
Healthcare sustainability
National Health and Climate Strategy
Croakey Conference News Service
Croakey Professional Services
Planetary Health Equity Hothouse 2024
#CroakeyLIVE #DigitalNationBuilding
#CroakeyLIVE #VoiceForHealth
#CroakeyGO #NavigatingHealth
Environmental determinants of health
Social determinants of health
Commercial determinants of health
Disasters and extreme weather events
Bushfire-emergency 2019-2020
Donor-funded journalism – 2024
Donor-funded journalism – 2023
Donor-funded journalism – 2022
Donor-funded journalism – 2021
Donor-funded journalism – 2020
lutruwita/Tasmania 2024 election
United States election 2024
Community controlled sector
Cultural determinants of health
Social and emotional wellbeing
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)
Non communicable diseases
Asylum seeker and refugee health
Health policy and systems
Health financing and costs
National Health Performance Authority
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
Strengthening Medicare Taskforce 2022
National Commission of Audit 2014
Australian Medical Association
Emergency departments and care
International medical graduates
Safety and quality of healthcare and aged care
Health & medical marketing
Misinformation and disinformation
Public interest journalism
Social media and healthcare
Croakey Funding Drive June 2024
Public health and population health
Australian Centre for Disease Control
National Preventive Health Agency
#PreventiveHealthStrategy
#UnmetNeedsinPublicHealth
Health and medical education
Health and medical research
Croakey Conference News Service 2013 – 2023
Equally Well 2022 Symposium
Choosing Wisely National Meeting 2022
#HealthClimateSolutions21
#IndigenousClimateJustice21
Australian Palliative Care Conference
#AusCanIndigenousWellness
Population Health Congress 2015
CRANAplus conference 2014
Cultural Solutions - Healing Foundation forum 2014
Lowitja Institute Continuous Quality Improvement conference 2014
National Suicide Prevention Conference 2014
Racism and children/youth health symposium 2014
Rural & Remote Health Scientific Symposium 2014
Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation Forum 2013
Australian Health Promotion Association Conference 2013
Closing the Credibility Gap 2013
CRANAplus Conference 2013
Health Workforce Australia 2013
International Health Literacy Network Conference 2013
National Rural Health Conference 2013
Oceania EcoHealth Symposium 2013
Croakey Professional Services archive
#CommunityControl Twitter Festival
Healthdirect Australia series 2019
Lowitja Indigenous knowledge translation series
#CroakeyFundingDrive 2022
#CroakeyLIVE #Budget2021Health
#CroakeyLIVE #USvotesHealth
#CroakeyLIVE Federal election 2022
Croakey register of influence
Croakey Register of Influencers in Public Health
Croakey Register of Unreleased Documents
CroakeyGO archive 2017 – 2018
#CroakeyGO #QuantumWords 2018
#CroakeyGO #VicVotes 2018
#CroakeyGO Callan Park 2018
#CroakeyGO Carnarvon 2018
#CroakeyGO Marrickville 2018
#CroakeyGO Palm Island 2018
#CroakeyGO Melbourne 2017
#CroakeyGO Newcastle 2017
Elections and Budgets 2013 – 2021
#AusVotesHealth Twitter Festival 2019
The difficulty in obtaining good advice about prostate cancer from doctors is that they are probably as confused as the patient. It’s confusing because the disease is different in different people. You can have a high PSA and no cancer, a normal PSA and cancer, and a normal biopsy with cancer. The cancer may be aggressive or indolent. The treatment may or may not be worse than the disease.
A good GP or specialist should be able to counsel you regarding these allowing you to make up your mind whether you want to be screened or not. A good doctor shouldn’t tell you what to do; it’s your decision. That’s the basis of consent. If your GP or specialist hasn’t done this properly, the best thing would be to find someone who will.
While not perfect, the PSA test along with a digital recal exam are the best tools available in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.
I am of the opinion that I want to know, rather than que sera sera if possible. I am one who had regular psa tests for several years, and because of a rapid rise in the PSA, was sent for other tests which revealed a fairly aggressive tumor, which was treated.
Without the regular PSA test, the tumor would not have been found, and I would have probably had a diagnosis a couple of years down the road, and the possibility that the cancer would have spread outside of the prostate.
I meet too many men who do not have a regular PSA test, and by the time they have symptoms, and go to find out what is causing their problem, it, in many cases results in a poor diagnosis, few treatment options and in many cases premature death.
Have a PSA test done on an annual basis once you reach 50. If there is a history ofe prostate issues in the family, or are of African descent, then start testing at the age of 40.
Robert, I am in two minds whether I should further comment or not. Anyway it appears that I am.
The PSA test is a poor screening test with many flaws. It is nowhere near as useful as say a pap smear, or a faecal blood test. Thats why it shouldn’t be performed unless these flaws are fully explained to the patient. You mention that men who have had a diagnosis of prostate cancer would have been better off had they had the test sooner.
Unfortunately this isn’t necessarily true. Their PSA could have been normal, or it could have already spread before it went high. No-one will ever know. If it were as simple as high PSA=earlier diagnosis and a cure you would be right, in which case everyone (male that is!) at risk should have one. But because it isn’t we suggest you discuss this with a doctor before embarking down this path because if you think this is complicated wait until the diagnosis is unclear. I hope this isn’t confusing, because this topic certainly is.
Jon,
You are right, the PSA test is not perfect. There are some men with low PSA who have prostate cancer, and men with high PSA and biopsy indicate no prostate cancer. The argument that one should not have REGULAR PSA tests because of potential false positive or false negative is, in my opinion, flawed.
What many suggest is to ignore the potential benefits of PSA testing, and live in blissful ignorance. That is not for me. Certainly no one should automatically count on cancer with a high PSA, but again I am of the mind that I would rather investigate the cause of a higher PSA than the alternative which is know nothing, do nothing.
This controversy may be mute in a few years as I have read of new more accurate tests coming, but in the meantime, check your PSA annually in combination with a digital rectal exam.