Health Minister Greg Hunt last week approved plans by private health insurance funds to increase premiums by nearly 5 per cent from April, seeking to make the medicine more palatable for insurance holders by spruiking it as “the lowest premium price rise in ten years”.
In the article below, originally published at The Conversation, Karen Willis, Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching), Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University and Dr Sophie Lewis, Lecturer, University of Sydney look at the latest rise and the impact and risks for consumers, informed by their research on how Australians ‘navigate the healthcare maze’, and discuss how crucial parts of the argument are missed in these announcements:
While there is a focus on people questioning the value of private health insurance, and whether these increased premiums are justified, there is very little questioning of how we might maximise the value of the public health care system.
In other responses, the Consumer Health Forum welcomed any downward pressure on the rate of premium increases but noted the latest jump is still about three times above the inflation rate and will hit families with another $200 a year more as the coverage of many policies tends to shrink. It called on the Federal Government to use the (massive) health insurance rebate to drive system improvements, saying in a statement:
“Health insurance policies should be simpler, making it easier for consumers to compare different fund offerings and obtain best value. The rebate should only apply to polices that cover necessary, evidence-based procedures and services.
“The private health insurance industry has had years of buoyant returns with the help of many billions of dollars in taxpayer financed subsidies while consumers have been hit with big premium rises years after year.
“It’s time for the balance to be restored in favour of the consumer.”
The Rural Doctors Association of Australia (RDAA) said the latest rise will mean patients in rural areas will be getting even less value for money than ever before, as they have access to far fewer private healthcare services that are commonplace in cities, and there is no additional support via PHI for rural patients who choose to travel elsewhere to seek private healthcare.
RDAA President, Dr Ewen McPhee said one great option to encourage more takeup and value would be for PHI providers to offer their rural and remote customers travel and accommodation support “as an alternative to fit-bits and gym memberships”. Read the full statement.
See also these previous articles at Croakey that provide additional context, including ongoing calls to end the massive public subsidies of the private health insurance industry.
Karen Willis and Sophie Lewis write
A topic of discussion at many barbecues this summer will inevitably be private health insurance. Is it worth it? Do we need it? Every year it gets more expensive. The average 4.8% increase in premiums just announced will have more Australians raising these questions, and debating with their friends how much they value choice of doctor, reduced waiting times for elective surgery, and having a private room when in hospital.
Private health insurance is mostly a private industry, but governments play a key role in ensuring private health insurance companies remain profitable and viable. Government policies encourage us all to have private health insurance by providing incentives for people to take out health insurance and imposing tax penalties for those on high incomes who do not have private health insurance.
Government makes decisions about pricing and funds the 30% rebate for many consumers with private health insurance. This is costing tax payers an estimated A$6 billion each year; money many economists argue is not justified and would be better spent in the public system.
Should the government have allowed this premium rise?
Each year private health insurance funds lobby the government to increase premiums. They claim increases are warranted because of an ageing population, increasing costs of health services and technologies, and decreasing government subsidies to consumers.
New federal health minister Greg Hunt has approved an average increase in premiums of 4.8%, with actual price hikes ranging from 2.9% up to 8.5%. This will mean families will pay up to $200 more per year, and singles up to $100 more each year.
The government argues this is the lowest premium increase in a decade. But this ignores the cumulative increase of 28% since 2012.
A premium that was $2000 in 2010 now costs about $3000. Many economists believe current premium increases, which are well over inflation rates, can’t be justified.
At a time when health insurance funds have increased profits, people are wondering about the value for money they get when they sign up for private health insurance.
Dissatisfaction on the issue was clearly on the political agenda in 2016, when previous health minister Sussan Ley announced a public consultation on private health insurance. This consultation made clear the concerns people have about poor value for money, high out of pocket costs, and complex regulations.
These issues have all been raised in our own research with consumers, and have been repeatedly raised by consumer organisations such as the Consumer Health Forum. Despite this consultation, it appears little has changed.
It is claimed Australians are paying more than ever for their private health insurance but are getting less and less. There are concerns about lack of transparency about what is covered, waiting periods and exclusions, and unexpected out-of-pocket costs.
Shifting responsibility to consumers
Each year when we discuss the premium price hikes, the concern is focused on how consumers, not industry, will react. The onus is often on consumers to be more aware, more active, and lobby for their needs. There are a range of sites dedicated to helping consumers make the best choice.
There is alarm that some people will drop their cover completely. But given the fear people have about needing private health insurance, there seems to be more consensus that people will reduce their level of cover rather than dropping it.
However, the risks of doing so are often not explored. Exposure to large and unexpected out of pocket costs, and as found in our research, the realisation (too late) that some procedures are not covered. When people do use their private health insurance they are likely to pay a gap, but these expenses are not clearly defined.
While there is a focus on people questioning the value of private health insurance, and whether these increased premiums are justified, there is very little questioning of how we might maximise the value of the public health care system.
For example, the outrage is not extended to the need to lobby government about strengthening the public health system, which is where most people, especially those who are poor and with complex health needs, end up.
Lots of arguments are made that the private health sector is important for a strong public system. In our research, it was evident some people view having private health insurance as helping out the health care system, and making space in the public system for people who cannot afford health insurance.
We know many Australians take out health insurance simply to avoid paying more tax through the Medicare levy surcharge. Some question whether they would rather be putting their money into Medicare than an industry they may choose never to use.
The federal government needs to implement greater protections for those who purchase private health insurance and ensure better value for the substantial funds taxpayers invest in private health insurance, directly and indirectly, through the private health insurance rebate, premiums, Medicare reimbursements and out-of-pocket costs.
This article was originally published at The Conversation and is republished here with permission. See the original article.
