Let’s debate the fairness of our tax system, not Duncan Storrar *UPDATED*

It’s likely that Victorian Council of Social Service (VCOSS) CEO Emma King is speaking for many Australians in this post below, cross-published here with permission from the organisation’s  Facebook page. It follows the front page treatment (feature image above) given to Duncan Storrar in today’s Herald Sun after he rose to national prominence with his question about tax equity on this week’s ABC Q&A program.

Earlier in the week the Herald Sun also attracted criticism and concern with a front page story and series of photos about “aggressive beggars picking fights with pedestrians” – we have pixilated the twitter pic (right) which critics, like ABC 774 Morning host Jon Faine have said the Melbourne newspaper should at least have done.  VCOSS tweeted then: “The best way to address homelessness is to attack its root causes, not publicly humiliate its victims.” See also this response by the Council for Homeless Persons (CHP).

Editor Damon Johnston defended the paper’s coverage on Faine’s show this morning. On Duncan Storrar, he said:

“If you put yourself on the public stage, particularly in the middle of an election campaign, questioning government policy… I think you’re entitled to be subject to a bit of scrutiny.”

The exchange is very much worth a listen, particularly at this point in the federal election campaign.

https://soundcloud.com/774-abc-melbourne/herald-sun-editor-damon-johnston-with-jon-faine-on-774-abc-melbourne

See also this piece:What the Duncan Storrar controversy teaches us about debating people over policy

[divide style=”dots” width=”medium”]

Emma King writes:

There has never been a more dangerous time to be an Australian. Just ask Duncan Storrar.

We now live in an age where simply having the temerity to ask a Government MP a question about tax relief makes you fair game for public ridicule. After his appearance on Q&A, some have elevated Duncan to the status of a national hero. But Duncan didn’t ask for that. Others have sought to tear Duncan down. He certainly didn’t ask for that.

They say never to pick a fight with somebody who buys ink by the barrel. And that may be true. But all Duncan did was ask a question.

[divide style=”dashs” width=”medium”]

UPDATE, 20 May 2016

A coalition of more than thirty community leaders, commentators and thinkers in civil society, including representatives of disability organisations and not for profits, eminent individuals, union and association leaders, and other commentators, this morning released a “National Civil Society Statement of Concern” about the media treatment of Duncan Storrar. The statement, which underscores the right of any member of the public to ask questions, the job of the media to report them, and the responsibility of parliamentarians to protect our ability to do so, is reproduced below. It can also be found here.

Civil Society Statement of Concern The media and Mr Duncan Storrar Friday 20 May 2016  We are a diverse group of community leaders, commentators and thinkers in civil society and civic participation coming together to express concerns about the media treatment of Mr Duncan Storrar and what this says about the current state of our democracy. Mr Storrar is a person with a disability experiencing a low income who has been subject to intense and intrusive negative scrutiny after asking a question about tax inequality on a current affairs program. On the ABC’s Q&A program on Monday 9 May 2016 Mr Storrar asked a question about the Budget, tax cuts, and income inequality.  In speaking to these topical current affairs matters he identified as a person with disability who is struggling to support a family while experiencing a low income. Mr Storrar engaged in appropriate and civil discussion inside the program format and made a valid response that all people pay tax including via taxes applied to petrol, goods and services. Since asking that question Mr Storrar has been subject to an onslaught of personal investigations, attacks, intrusion into his privacy, family and ridicule in a range of publications, including The Australian and The Herald Sun newspapers.  The patent disregard of the impact of this reporting on an individual is an abuse of power. The reporting has also been a further example of the willingness of parts of the media to vilify and demonise people on low incomes or from marginalised backgrounds. We believe it’s time to ask why a member of the community is being targeted in an extreme way for simply asking a question about the fairness of a tax cut on a national broadcaster during an election campaign. The issues involved go beyond one individual and represent a turning point for the open debate, discussion, criticism and dissent which underpin our free society. It’s also time we heard where our leaders stand on the rights of all people, particularly community members, to participate in public debates without bullying and intimidation.  Political leaders have a positive obligation to protect public participation by people who are less powerful, knowing that more powerful people will otherwise dominate our democracy. It is a public right to ask questions. It is the job of the media to report them and the responsibility of parliamentarians to protect our ability to do so. Therefore: We are concerned that: a member of the community is being targeted in an extreme and disproportionate way for peacefully expressing widely held views on income and equality issues on the national broadcaster during the federal election campaign; the treatment of Mr Storrar sets a dangerous precedent across the democratic process.  Any person who writes a letter, takes part in a newspaper ‘vox pop’ or rings a talk back radio station with views about income inequality or fairness now has a reasonable basis for feeling under threat of retribution through intrusive and personalised attacks; that people on low incomes or people with a disability, people living with a mental illness who are vulnerable or marginalised are systematically excluded from the democratic process when it comes to participating in public debates. This is a dangerous and unhelpful position which reverses democratic tradition dating back to the abolition of property rights for suffrage; and there appears to be a lack of leadership from politicians, institutions and the media to safeguard long held rights for all people to express their lived experience as part of the democratic process during a Federal Election. We call on: Our national leaders including the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition to clearly and publically reaffirm the rights and responsibilities of all people regardless of background, disabilities or income level, to take part in public debate and to express diverse opinions in the public square in a peaceful way free from bullying, personal intrusion, harassment or intimidation; The incoming Human Rights Commissioner to begin a dialogue on responsible measures, such as an Australian Bill of Rights, to safeguard the rights of members of the community and civil society organisations to engage in civil discourse and public debate free from gags, threats, bullying and harassment; The Press Council and the Australian Communications and Media Authority to investigate whether the media treatment and extreme overreach in the response to Mr Storrar’s question on the national broadcaster constitutes a breach of their Standards and requirements. These include to avoid causing or contributing materially to substantial offence, distress or prejudice, or a substantial risk to health or safety unless doing so is sufficiently in the public interest; and Media organisations to recognise and affirm that the ability of individuals to speak in the public arena free from interference, bullying and intimidation is entwined with their own freedom to publish without interference, bullying and intimidation from the State. In doing so we invite all media outlets concerned with the coverage of Mr Storrar to reflect on the articles which underpin the Charter for a Free Press in Australiaagreed by the Press Council in 2003. The charter preamble underpinned through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  Article 19 of the Declaration provides: “Everyone has the right of freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”. This Civil Society Statement of Concern is supported by: Robert Altamore, Executive Officer, People with Disability ACT (PWD ACT) Karen Batt, Community and Public Sector Union Joint National Secretary Greg Barns, Barrister and Former National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance Jackie Brady, Executive Director, Family Relationships Services Australia Julian Burnside, AO QC Irina Cattalini, Chief Executive Officer, WA Council of Social Service (WACOSS) Kasy Chambers, Executive Director, Anglicare Australia Dwayne Cranfield, Chief Executive Officer, National Ethnic Disability Alliance (NEDA) Dr John Falzon, Chief Executive Officer, St Vincent de Paul Society, National Council of Australia Carolyn Frohmader, Executive Director, Women With Disabilities Australia (WWDA) Travis Gilbert, Executive Officer, ACT Shelter Inc Dr Cassandra Goldie, Chief Executive Officer, Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) Kym Goodes, Chief Executive Officer, Tasmanian Council of Social Service (TasCOSS) Damian Griffis, Chief Executive Officer, First Peoples Disability Network (Australia) Meredith Hammat, Secretary, UnionsWA Max Hardy, Consultant, author and advocate for citizen voice Susan Helyar, Director, ACT Council of Social Service Inc. (ACTCOSS) Mark Henley, Chief Executive Officer, Queensland Council of Social Service (QCOSS) Ged Kearney, President, Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Tim Kennedy, National Secretary, National Union of Workers. Emma King, Chief Executive Officer, Victorian Council of Social Service (VCOSS) Dr Caroline Lambert, Executive Officer, YWCA Marcelle Mogg, Chief Executive Officer, Catholic Social Services Australia Wendy Morton, Chief Executive Officer, NT Council of Social Service (NTCOSS) Michele O’Neil, National Secretary, National Secretary of the Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia Adrian Pisarski, Executive Officer National Shelter Christina Ryan, Chief Executive Officer, Advocacy for Inclusion Jo-anne Schofield, National Secretary, United Voice Gerard Thomas, Welfare Rights Centre NSW David Thompson, Chief Executive Officer, Jobs Australia Craig Wallace, President, People with Disability Australia (PWDA) Alex White, Secretary, UnionsACT Greg Withers, Chief Executive Officer, Community Housing Industry Association Ross Womersley, Chief Executive Officer, SA Council of Social Service (SACOSS) Heather Yeatman, Board President Public Health Association Australia Media first contact: Craig Wallace, President, People with Disability Australia 0413 135 731 Alternate contacts:  Dr Cassandra Goldie, Chief Executive Officer, Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) 0419 626 155 and Dr John Falzon, Chief Executive Officer, St Vincent de Paul Society, National Council of Australia  0421 332 247.