Federal Budget October 2022
Healthcare sustainability
National Health and Climate Strategy
Croakey Conference News Service
Croakey Professional Services
Planetary Health Equity Hothouse 2024
#CroakeyLIVE #DigitalNationBuilding
#CroakeyLIVE #VoiceForHealth
#CroakeyGO #NavigatingHealth
Environmental determinants of health
Social determinants of health
Commercial determinants of health
Disasters and extreme weather events
Bushfire-emergency 2019-2020
Donor-funded journalism – 2024
Donor-funded journalism – 2023
Donor-funded journalism – 2022
Donor-funded journalism – 2021
Donor-funded journalism – 2020
lutruwita/Tasmania 2024 election
United States election 2024
Community controlled sector
Cultural determinants of health
Social and emotional wellbeing
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)
Non communicable diseases
Asylum seeker and refugee health
Health policy and systems
Health financing and costs
National Health Performance Authority
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
Strengthening Medicare Taskforce 2022
National Commission of Audit 2014
Australian Medical Association
Emergency departments and care
International medical graduates
Safety and quality of healthcare and aged care
Health & medical marketing
Misinformation and disinformation
Public interest journalism
Social media and healthcare
Croakey Funding Drive June 2024
Public health and population health
Australian Centre for Disease Control
National Preventive Health Agency
#PreventiveHealthStrategy
#UnmetNeedsinPublicHealth
Health and medical education
Health and medical research
Croakey Conference News Service 2013 – 2023
Equally Well 2022 Symposium
Choosing Wisely National Meeting 2022
#HealthClimateSolutions21
#IndigenousClimateJustice21
Australian Palliative Care Conference
#AusCanIndigenousWellness
Population Health Congress 2015
CRANAplus conference 2014
Cultural Solutions - Healing Foundation forum 2014
Lowitja Institute Continuous Quality Improvement conference 2014
National Suicide Prevention Conference 2014
Racism and children/youth health symposium 2014
Rural & Remote Health Scientific Symposium 2014
Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation Forum 2013
Australian Health Promotion Association Conference 2013
Closing the Credibility Gap 2013
CRANAplus Conference 2013
Health Workforce Australia 2013
International Health Literacy Network Conference 2013
National Rural Health Conference 2013
Oceania EcoHealth Symposium 2013
Croakey Professional Services archive
#CommunityControl Twitter Festival
Healthdirect Australia series 2019
Lowitja Indigenous knowledge translation series
#CroakeyFundingDrive 2022
#CroakeyLIVE #Budget2021Health
#CroakeyLIVE #USvotesHealth
#CroakeyLIVE Federal election 2022
Croakey register of influence
Croakey Register of Influencers in Public Health
Croakey Register of Unreleased Documents
CroakeyGO archive 2017 – 2018
#CroakeyGO #QuantumWords 2018
#CroakeyGO #VicVotes 2018
#CroakeyGO Callan Park 2018
#CroakeyGO Carnarvon 2018
#CroakeyGO Marrickville 2018
#CroakeyGO Palm Island 2018
#CroakeyGO Melbourne 2017
#CroakeyGO Newcastle 2017
Elections and Budgets 2013 – 2021
#AusVotesHealth Twitter Festival 2019
How many institutes, NGOs, universities etc have published, readily accessible policies on how they interact with pharmaceutical companies? Are there any on the websites? Or do they, as it appears the Baker Institute does, and “Take the devil’s money to do God’s work”? The Baker Institute’s ‘slam-dunk’ move – so finely orchestrated and probably a fait accompli should be of great concern to health consumer groups and the community as a whole. The scheduled ad for Friday’s Australian Dr with the Baker’s logo alogside that of the drug company says it all. Yes – a picture is worth a 1000 words. Big (& small) Pharma is well aware of its reputation. As Bill Curtis (of Medical Communications company) Curtis Jones Brown said: “In Australia the industry is seen as manipulative, dark, menacing…” And a reflection from a Vice President of Schering-Plough..”One industry that is ahead of us by a long way is the tobacco industry. Now that scares the hell out of me. I am appalled by our reputation”. Yes – we literally cannot live in terms of research funding and professional education in the health sector without support from the pharmaceutical companies but lets see some published policies from those that want the money.
While busy congratulating themselves on developing “an innovative donation arrangement” perhaps they could’ve spent more time wondering why nobody else has tried it before.
There are so many other ways in which Baker could obtain sponsorship funds from sanofi-aventis that would not impinge on anyone’s credibility.
The statements on the Baker Institute website seem more focused on alaying concerns about Pharmaco funding in general – but really misses the point that will get them into hot water – it’s not just that its money from a Pharmaco, there is just no way to avoid a conflict of interest when you link sponsorship revenue to (prescription) product sales.
Nevermind pressure from the drug company, if Baker’s own in-house finance department lets their scientists work on projects could potentially reduce Plavix scripts, and therefore their own revenue, one might question their competence (though that could provide a further explanation as to why the Institute needs to seek industry funding).